Summary: ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION, TESTING AND GRADING
Although many people including teachers and students limit
the meaning of assessment to giving tests and assigning grades, Scanland (2012)
defines assessment as the process of making a judgment or measurement of worth
of an entity. That could be a person, a process, or a program. According to Brissenden and Slater n.d. as
cited by Scanlan (2012), learner assessment is designed to serve several
purposes. They are “motivating and directing learning”, “providing feedback to
students on their performance”, “providing feedback on instruction and/or the
curriculum”, and “ensuring standards of progression are met”. Besides, learner
assessment involves communication to teachers who will be able to get feedback
on teaching, students on their own learning, curriculum designers on the
curriculum, and administrators on the use of resources.
Regarding the importance of assessment, they explain that it
drives students learning. It means that depending on the strategies used, different
kinds of learning will take place. In that case, assessment strategies that
focus on recall of knowledge will likely promote superficial learning. On the
other hand, if assessment strategies that demand critical thinking or creative
problem-solving are chosen, students will have a higher level of achievement.
According to McAlpine (2002) as cited by Scanlan (2012)
there exist dichotomies poles to explain the different types of assessment: “Formative
vs. Summative”, “Informal vs. Formal”, “Continuous vs. Final”, “Process vs. Product”,
and “Divergent vs. Convergent”. The Formative aims to provide feedback to the
learner, which can be used to identify strengths and weakness and hence improve
future performance. The summative on the other hand, is used primarily to make
decisions for grading or determine readiness for progression and communicate students’
abilities to external entities such as administrators or employees.
In the Informal assessment, the judgments are integrated
with other tasks often used to provide formative feedback. It tends to be less threatening
for the students and for that reason less stressful to them. In the case of Formal assessment, students are
aware that the task they are doing is for assessment purpose. They are
summative in nature and tend to have greater motivation impact as they are
associated with increased stress.
Continuous assessment happens throughout a learning
experience. Even though it involves increased effort for teacher and student,
it provides with the information needed to improve teaching and learning in
process. Different from the one previously presented, The Final assessment
takes place at the end of a learning activity, so it cannot be used for
formative purposes.
Process and Product assessments differ in that the first one
focusses on the steps or procedures underlying a particular ability or task;
but the second one takes into account the result or outcome of a process. It means
it focuses on the answer, not on the steps to get that result.
The last types of assessments are Divergent and Convergent. Divergent
refers to those for which a range of answers or solutions might be considered correct
like in essay texts. Contrary to Divergent, the Convergent has only one correct
response per question, and it values the assessment of real knowledge.
Last but not least, Scanlan (2012) states the distinction
between assessment vs. evaluation, and assessment vs. grading. The most
important aspect highlighted is that assessment is for students while
evaluation is for instruction. In the same way, assessment is contrasted with
grading and it is stated that the last one is considered a component of
assessment although many think they are totally different because assessment is
to measure student growth and process. Whichever conception is taken anyway,
will depend on the teacher’s own philosophy.
I wonder if there will be a day when the results of final exams are not the main source for assessing students’ learning and readiness for progression. The author suggests that good teachers are constantly assessing each student individually and in different ways, but I still think that in the Colombian case this is highly unlikely to happen. Most teachers in our country (the ones working with big groups of students) have to struggle to give each student the feedback he/she needs for improving his/her learning process. If no changes are made in our educational system, we will keep perpetuating one of the main problems it has: the fact that learners study only for passing an exam, and then hardly remember what it was about after having taken it. What is more important, passing an exam or learning?
ReplyDeleteTeacher are the ones who should change first and help students develop that perspective on appreciate more the fact of learning rather that a number that could be sometimes frustrating.
ReplyDeleteTeachers, sorry!
DeleteThat is why we need to learn more about assessment. Very high expectations on us, though. :P
Delete